Shepard Elevator Co. v. Malba Gardens Corp.
This text of 230 A.D. 769 (Shepard Elevator Co. v. Malba Gardens Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion of defendants Malba Gardens Corporation, Gotham Associates, Inc., Cherco, Inc., and Emanuel Gold to dismiss the complaint, or to strike certain paragraphs from it, or to direct service of an amended complaint, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Said defendants may have leave to answer within ten days from service of a copy of the order herein. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 A.D. 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shepard-elevator-co-v-malba-gardens-corp-nyappdiv-1930.