Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., LTD. v. United States

Court of International Trade

Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., LTD. v. United States

367 F. Supp. 3d 1382

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., LTD. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 357 F. Supp. 3d 1295 →

United States Court of International Trade·Decided April 10, 2019·No. Consol. Court No. 16-00116; Slip Op. 19-44·Published

Opinion

Mark A. Barnett, Judge

This case having been submitted for decision, and the court, after due deliberation, having rendered a decision herein; now, in conformity with that opinion it is hereby

ORDERED that the final results and final rescission of the 20th administrative review of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from the People's Republic of China, see Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China , 81 Fed. Reg. 39,897 (Dep't Commerce June 20, 2016) (final results and final rescission of the 20th antidumping duty admin. review; 2013-2014), as amended by the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, ECF No. 69-1, and the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, ECF No. 90, are SUSTAINED , and it is further

ORDERED that the subject entries must be liquidated in accordance with the final court decision, including all appeals, as provided for in Section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(e) (2012).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mark A. Barnett, Judge

This case having been submitted for decision, and the court, after due deliberation, having rendered a decision herein; now, in conformity with that opinion it is hereby

ORDERED that the final results and final rescission of the 20th administrative review of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from the People's Republic of China, see Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China , 81 Fed. Reg. 39,897 (Dep't Commerce June 20, 2016) (final results and final rescission of the 20th antidumping duty admin. review; 2013-2014), as amended by the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, ECF No. 69-1, and the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, ECF No. 90, are SUSTAINED , and it is further

ORDERED that the subject entries must be liquidated in accordance with the final court decision, including all appeals, as provided for in Section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(e) (2012).

Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., LTD. v. United States, 367 F. Supp. 3d 1382 (cit 2019).

Pincite

367 F. Supp. 3d 1382 (Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., LTD. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related