Shenzhen Xinboda Indus. Co. v. United States
Opinion
Slip Op. 19-44
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
SHENZHEN XINBODA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.,
Plaintiff,
JINXIANG HEJIA CO., LTD., ET AL.,
Plaintiff-Intervenors,
and
QINGDAO TIANTAIXING FOODS CO., LTD., ET AL., Before: Mark A. Barnett, Judge Consolidated-Plaintiffs, Consol. Court No. 16-00116
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant,
FRESH GARLIC PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION, ET AL.,
Defendant-Intervenors.
JUDGMENT
This case having been submitted for decision, and the court, after due
deliberation, having rendered a decision herein; now, in conformity with that opinion it is
hereby
ORDERED that the final results and final rescission of the 20th administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from the People’s Republic of Consol. Court No. 16-00116 Page 2
China, see Fresh Garlic From the People’s Republic of China, 81 Fed. Reg. 39,897
(Dep’t Commerce June 20, 2016) (final results and final rescission of the 20th
antidumping duty admin. review; 2013-2014), as amended by the Final Results of
Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, ECF No. 69-1, and the Final Results of
Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, ECF No. 90, are SUSTAINED, and it is
further
ORDERED that the subject entries must be liquidated in accordance with the
final court decision, including all appeals, as provided for in Section 516A(e) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(e) (2012).
/s/ Mark A. Barnett Mark A. Barnett, Judge
Dated: April 10, 2019 New York, New York
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2019 CIT 44 (Shenzhen Xinboda Indus. Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.