Shenzhen Xinboda Indus. Co. v. United States

2019 CIT 44
United States Court of International Trade·Decided April 10, 2019·No. Consol. 16-00116·Published

Opinion

Slip Op. 19-44

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

SHENZHEN XINBODA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.,

Plaintiff,

JINXIANG HEJIA CO., LTD., ET AL., Plaintiff-Intervenors,

and

QINGDAO TIANTAIXING FOODS CO., LTD., ET AL., Before: Mark A. Barnett, Judge Consolidated-Plaintiffs, Consol. Court No. 16-00116

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant,

and

FRESH GARLIC PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION, ET AL.,

Defendant-Intervenors.

JUDGMENT

This case having been submitted for decision, and the court, after due deliberation, having rendered a decision herein; now, in conformity with that opinion it is hereby ORDERED that the final results and final rescission of the 20th administrative review of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from the People’s Republic of

China, see Fresh Garlic From the People’s Republic of China, 81 Fed. Reg. 39,897 (Dep’t Commerce June 20, 2016) (final results and final rescission of the 20th antidumping duty admin. review; 2013-2014), as amended by the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, ECF No. 69-1, and the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, ECF No. 90, are SUSTAINED, and it is further ORDERED that the subject entries must be liquidated in accordance with the final court decision, including all appeals, as provided for in Section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(e) (2012).

/s/ Mark A. Barnett

Mark A. Barnett, Judge

Dated: April 10, 2019 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shenzhen Xinboda Indus. Co. v. United States, 2019 CIT 44 (cit 2019).

2019 CIT 44 (Shenzhen Xinboda Indus. Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related