Shensky v. State

135 S.E. 492, 36 Ga. App. 114, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 805
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 9, 1926
Docket17571
StatusPublished

This text of 135 S.E. 492 (Shensky v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shensky v. State, 135 S.E. 492, 36 Ga. App. 114, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 805 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Luke, J.

A conviction of keeping a lewd house was authorized by the evidence; and, the only ground of the motion for a new trial insisted upon being that “there is no evidence to sustain the verdict,” the judgment overruling the motion must be

Affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 S.E. 492, 36 Ga. App. 114, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shensky-v-state-gactapp-1926.