Shenita Lashon Davis v. State
This text of Shenita Lashon Davis v. State (Shenita Lashon Davis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-20-00011-CR
SHENITA LASHON DAVIS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 7th District Court Smith County, Texas Trial Court No. 007-0240-19
Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. ORDER Appellant Shenita Lashon Davis appeals from the revocation of her community supervision
and her sentence of seven years’ imprisonment for the crime of assault on a public servant. On
March 10, 2020, Davis’s court-appointed appellate counsel, Amy R. Blalock, filed an Anders1
brief, and on April 20, 2020, Davis filed a pro se motion for access to the appellate record for
purposes of preparing a response to her counsel’s Anders brief. Davis’s motion for access to the
appellate record is granted. Under Kelly v. State,2 we are required to enter an order specifying the
procedure to be followed to ensure Davis’s access to the record.
On April 21, 2020, Blalock mailed a complete paper copy of the appellate record to Davis.
Allowing ten days from the date of this order for the record to be delivered to Davis and giving
her thirty days to prepare her pro se response, we hereby set June 15, 2020, as the deadline for
Davis to file her pro se response to her counsel’s Anders brief.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
DATE: April 30, 2020
1 See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 2 Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 321–22 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Shenita Lashon Davis v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shenita-lashon-davis-v-state-texapp-2020.