Shen v. Hospital Hill Health Services Corp.

20 F. App'x 595
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 11, 2001·No. 01-2013·Unpublished

Opinion

*596 PER CURIAM.

William Z. Shen appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his employment-discrimination and breach-of-contract action, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. We review for abuse of discretion, see Garland v. Peebles, 1 F.3d 683, 686 (8th Cir. 1993), and find none. Shen’s alleged difficulties with legal representation, though regrettable, do not excuse him from the litigant’s responsibility to comply with the district court’s substantive and procedural requirements. See Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 633-34, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962); Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 804 (8th Cir.1986). Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Shen’s post-appeal motion.

1

. The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shen v. Hospital Hill Health Services Corp., 20 F. App'x 595 (8th Cir. 2001).

20 F. App'x 595 (Shen v. Hospital Hill Health Services Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related