Shen v. Fielder
This text of 248 A.D.2d 364 (Shen v. Fielder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), entered July 18, 1997, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that there exists a triable issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the automobile accident at issue (see, Steuer v Di-[365]*365Donna, 233 AD2d 494; Rut v Grigonis, 214 AD2d 721; Bates v Peeples, 171 AD2d 635; cf., Beckett v Conte, 176 AD2d 774).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D.2d 364, 669 N.Y.S.2d 862, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shen-v-fielder-nyappdiv-1998.