Shelton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Shelton v. State

505 S.W.3d 399, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1237, 2016 WL 6962085

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 29, 2016·No. No. ED 103843·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Dwayne Shelton (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his post-conviction motion pursuant Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing. Following a jury trial, Movant was found guilty of statutory sodomy, in violation of Section 566.062 (RSMo. Cum. Supp. 2008). Movant was sentenced as a persistent offender to 25 years imprisonment in the Missouri Department of Corrections. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Dwayne Shelton (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his post-conviction motion pursuant Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing. Following a jury trial, Movant was found guilty of statutory sodomy, in violation of Section 566.062 (RSMo. Cum. Supp. 2008). Movant was sentenced as a persistent offender to 25 years imprisonment in the Missouri Department of Corrections. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Shelton v. State, 505 S.W.3d 399, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1237, 2016 WL 6962085 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

505 S.W.3d 399 (Shelton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.