Shelton v. State

175 S.W.3d 200, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1962, 2005 WL 2851536
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 1, 2005·No. No. ED 86049·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Hermon Shelton (Appellant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.151 motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k), State v. Moore, 930 S.W.2d 464, 468 (Mo.App. E.D.1996). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shelton v. State, 175 S.W.3d 200, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1962, 2005 WL 2851536 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

175 S.W.3d 200 (Shelton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Moore
930 S.W.2d 464 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996)