Shelton v. State
104 So. 3d 1238, 2012 WL 6629614, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21961
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See State v. McBride, 848 So.2d 287, 291 (Fla.2003) (“Collateral estoppel ... precludes a defendant from rearguing in a successive rule 3.800 motion the same issue argued in a prior motion.”); see also Bradley v. State, 3 So.3d 1168, 1168 (Fla.2009).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shelton v. State, 104 So. 3d 1238, 2012 WL 6629614, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21961 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
104 So. 3d 1238 (Shelton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bradley v. State
3 So. 3d 1168 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2009)
State v. McBride
848 So. 2d 287 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)