Shelton v. State
104 So. 3d 1238, 2012 WL 6629614, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21961
This text of 104 So. 3d 1238 (Shelton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Shelton v. State, 104 So. 3d 1238, 2012 WL 6629614, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21961 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See State v. McBride, 848 So.2d 287, 291 (Fla.2003) (“Collateral estoppel ... precludes a defendant from rearguing in a successive rule 3.800 motion the same issue argued in a prior motion.”); see also Bradley v. State, 3 So.3d 1168, 1168 (Fla.2009).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bradley v. State
3 So. 3d 1168 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2009)
State v. McBride
848 So. 2d 287 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
104 So. 3d 1238, 2012 WL 6629614, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shelton-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.