Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Shelton v. State

Shelton v. State

950 So. 2d 433, 2007 WL 187383
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 26, 2007·No. 5D06-1043·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

950 So.2d 433 (2007)

Bruce SHELTON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D06-1043.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

January 26, 2007.
Rehearing Denied March 14, 2007.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Christopher Sinclair Quarles, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ann M. Phillips, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PLEUS, C.J.

After careful review of the record, we conclude, given the defendant's own videotaped admissions, that any error in the references to the defendant's drug use had no impact whatsoever on the verdict returned by the jury.

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shelton v. State, 950 So. 2d 433, 2007 WL 187383 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

950 So. 2d 433 (Shelton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shelton v. State
974 So. 2d 1202 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)