Shelton v. State
This text of 950 So. 2d 433 (Shelton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Bruce SHELTON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Christopher Sinclair Quarles, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ann M. Phillips, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PLEUS, C.J.
After careful review of the record, we conclude, given the defendant's own videotaped admissions, that any error in the references to the defendant's drug use had no impact whatsoever on the verdict returned by the jury.
AFFIRMED.
SAWAYA and MONACO, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
950 So. 2d 433, 2007 WL 187383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shelton-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.