Shelton v. Deleonardo

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Shelton v. Deleonardo

145 A. 63, 109 Conn. 608

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided March 5, 1929·Published

Opinion

Haines, J.

The circumstances of this case are identical with those involved in the cases of Cora Bennett, Jane M. Curtiss, and Susan A. Rowan, against DeLeonardo, ante, p. 602. The evidence in all the cases was heard by Hon. Leonard J. Nickerson, State Referee, and a single finding of facts was made, and a copy filed in each court. The same remonstrance was interposed and was overruled by the Court of Common Pleas; judgment upon motion was thereupon entered for the plaintiff for $1013.13, from which the defendant De *609 Leonardo appealed. Our opinion in the eases referred to is conclusive upon the present case.

There is no error.

In this opinion the other judges concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haines, J.

The circumstances of this case are identical with those involved in the cases of Cora Bennett, Jane M. Curtiss, and Susan A. Rowan, against DeLeonardo, ante, p. 602. The evidence in all the cases was heard by Hon. Leonard J. Nickerson, State Referee, and a single finding of facts was made, and a copy filed in each court. The same remonstrance was interposed and was overruled by the Court of Common Pleas; judgment upon motion was thereupon entered for the plaintiff for $1013.13, from which the defendant De *609 Leonardo appealed. Our opinion in the eases referred to is conclusive upon the present case.

There is no error.

In this opinion the other judges concurred.

Shelton v. Deleonardo, 145 A. 63, 109 Conn. 608 (Colo. 1929).

Pincite

145 A. 63 (Shelton v. Deleonardo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.