Shelton v. Deleonardo

145 A. 63, 109 Conn. 608
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMarch 5, 1929
StatusPublished

This text of 145 A. 63 (Shelton v. Deleonardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shelton v. Deleonardo, 145 A. 63, 109 Conn. 608 (Colo. 1929).

Opinion

Haines, J.

The circumstances of this case are identical with those involved in the cases of Cora Bennett, Jane M. Curtiss, and Susan A. Rowan, against DeLeonardo, ante, p. 602. The evidence in all the cases was heard by Hon. Leonard J. Nickerson, State Referee, and a single finding of facts was made, and a copy filed in each court. The same remonstrance was interposed and was overruled by the Court of Common Pleas; judgment upon motion was thereupon entered for the plaintiff for $1013.13, from which the defendant De *609 Leonardo appealed. Our opinion in the eases referred to is conclusive upon the present case.

There is no error.

In this opinion the other judges concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 A. 63, 109 Conn. 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shelton-v-deleonardo-conn-1929.