Shelton v. Barnhart

Fourth Circuit

Shelton v. Barnhart

221 F. App'x 252

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 26, 2007·No. No. 06-1817·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie T. Shelton appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on the doctrine of res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Shelton v. Barnhart, No. 5:05-cv-00060-gec, 2006 WL 1400379 (W.D.Va. May 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie T. Shelton appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on the doctrine of res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Shelton v. Barnhart, No. 5:05-cv-00060-gec, 2006 WL 1400379 (W.D.Va. May 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Shelton v. Barnhart, 221 F. App'x 252 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

221 F. App'x 252 (Shelton v. Barnhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.