Shelton v. Angelone

54 F. App'x 579
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shelton v. Angelone. Read the opinion of the Court — 49 F. App'x 451
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 23, 2003·No. 02-7310·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

George R. Shelton seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. This court may exercise jurisdic *580 tion only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Shelton seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

*

Even if Shelton’s notice of appeal was construed as appealing the district court's November 6 order, dismissal would be appropriate. Shelton failed to file timely sufficient objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and has therefore waived this Court’s review of the claims asserted in his § 2254 petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shelton v. Angelone, 54 F. App'x 579 (4th Cir. 2003).

54 F. App'x 579 (Shelton v. Angelone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)