Shelton-Mills v. Mills

752 So. 2d 134, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2233
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 8, 2000·No. No. 3D99-979·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After entering final judgment in this domestic dispute, the trial court on rehearing correctly increased the husband’s share of his military pension to comply with DeLoach v. DeLoach, 590 So.2d 956 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), but made no other changes. In light of the improvement in the husband’s finances effected by the pension ruling, on this appeal by the wife from the amended final judgment we remand for an upward adjustment in the child support award, which we deem required in some amount under the circumstances, and for reconsideration, in the trial court’s discretion, of the denial of alimony and of the terms of equitable distribution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shelton-Mills v. Mills, 752 So. 2d 134, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2233 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

752 So. 2d 134 (Shelton-Mills v. Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKinnon v. State
752 So. 2d 134 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)