Shelnutt v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Shelnutt v. Davis

119 S.E. 456, 31 Ga. App. 22, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 705

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 3, 1923

Docket14676

StatusPublished

This text of 119 S.E. 456 (Shelnutt v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shelnutt v. Davis, 119 S.E. 456, 31 Ga. App. 22, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 705 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence demanded the verdict. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial, complaining of the charge to the jury and the ruling of the court upon the admissibility of evidence, and the ground as to newly discovered evidence, are wholly without merit. The court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. I. N. Cheney, Taylor Smith, for plaintiff in error. Griffith & Matthews, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The evidence demanded the verdict. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial, complaining of the charge to the jury and the ruling of the court upon the admissibility of evidence, and the ground as to newly discovered evidence, are wholly without merit. The court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. I. N. Cheney, Taylor Smith, for plaintiff in error. Griffith & Matthews, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 S.E. 456, 31 Ga. App. 22, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shelnutt-v-davis-gactapp-1923.