Shelly Washington v. E.R. Sutton William Hanham v. Reggie Moss Joyce McLaughlin

948 F.2d 1284, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 31891, 1991 WL 254875
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 5, 1991
Docket91-6640
StatusUnpublished

This text of 948 F.2d 1284 (Shelly Washington v. E.R. Sutton William Hanham v. Reggie Moss Joyce McLaughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shelly Washington v. E.R. Sutton William Hanham v. Reggie Moss Joyce McLaughlin, 948 F.2d 1284, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 31891, 1991 WL 254875 (4th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

948 F.2d 1284

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Shelly WASHINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
E.R. SUTTON; William Hanham, Defendants-Appellees,
v.
Reggie Moss; Joyce McLaughlin, Defendants.

No. 91-6640.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 30, 1991.
Decided Dec. 5, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-90-460-CRT-H)

Shelly Washington, appellant pro se.

Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Shelly Washington appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Washington v. Sutton, No. CA-90-460-CRT-H (E.D.N.C. July 31, 1991). We deny Washington's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
948 F.2d 1284, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 31891, 1991 WL 254875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shelly-washington-v-er-sutton-william-hanham-v-reg-ca4-1991.