Shelly L. Hall, M.D., P.A. v. White

28 So. 3d 69, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 18198, 2009 WL 4111314
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 30, 2009
Docket1D09-4848
StatusPublished

This text of 28 So. 3d 69 (Shelly L. Hall, M.D., P.A. v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shelly L. Hall, M.D., P.A. v. White, 28 So. 3d 69, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 18198, 2009 WL 4111314 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because competent substantial evidence supports the trial court’s finding that the motion to disqualify was not timely filed, *70 the petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits. See Amato v. Winn Dixie Stores/Sedgwick James, 810 So.2d 979, 981 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Amato v. Winn Dixie Stores/Sedgwick James
810 So. 2d 979 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 So. 3d 69, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 18198, 2009 WL 4111314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shelly-l-hall-md-pa-v-white-fladistctapp-2009.