Shelly L. Hall, M.D., P.A. v. White

28 So. 3d 69, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 18198, 2009 WL 4111314
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 30, 2009·No. 1D09-4848·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because competent substantial evidence supports the trial court’s finding that the motion to disqualify was not timely filed, *70 the petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits. See Amato v. Winn Dixie Stores/Sedgwick James, 810 So.2d 979, 981 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shelly L. Hall, M.D., P.A. v. White, 28 So. 3d 69, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 18198, 2009 WL 4111314 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

28 So. 3d 69 (Shelly L. Hall, M.D., P.A. v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Amato v. Winn Dixie Stores/Sedgwick James
810 So. 2d 979 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)