Shelly Fisher v. United States

229 F.2d 860, 29 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 69,765
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 15, 1956·No. 14687_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The District Court’s judgment in this case was affirmed by us on November 14, 1955. 1 No petition for rehearing having been filed, our mandate was issued on December 16, 1955, pursuant to our Rule 26. On January 23, 1956, appellant filed with our clerk a motion to recall our mandate and for leave to file a petition for rehearing. An affidavit of appellant was filed with the motion. However, no proposed petition for rehearing accompanied the motion, nor has any such proposed petition been presented to us; nor was any valid ground for such a petition stated in the motion or the affidavit. The motion is therefore .denied.

1

. Fisher v. United States, 9 Cir., 227 F.2d 930.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shelly Fisher v. United States, 229 F.2d 860, 29 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 69,765 (9th Cir. 1956).

229 F.2d 860 (Shelly Fisher v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ben Gold v. United States
237 F.2d 764 (D.C. Circuit, 1956)