Shelly Diane Valdez v. State
This text of Shelly Diane Valdez v. State (Shelly Diane Valdez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-16-00198-CR
SHELLY DIANE VALDEZ, Appellant v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the County Court at Law No. 1 Johnson County, Texas Trial Court No. M201501394
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Shelly Diane Valdez has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal.1 See TEX.
R. APP. P. 42.2(a). We have not issued a decision in this appeal, and Valdez personally
signed the motion. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.
We also grant Valdez’s request that “the mandate issue immediately.” The Clerk’s
Office is directed to issue the mandate concurrently with the rendering of the judgment.
1 The motion is entitled “Motion to Withdraw Appeal”; however, in the substance of the motion, Valdez “requests that the cause be dismissed.” We look to the substance of a pleading or motion, not its title, to determine its effect. See Ex parte Caldwell, 58 S.W.3d 127, 130 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). Valdez’s attorney’s request for an order discharging him as attorney of record is
denied without prejudice because it does not comply with Rule 6.5. TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5.
REX D. DAVIS Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed August 31, 2016 Do not publish [CR25]
Valdez v. State Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Shelly Diane Valdez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shelly-diane-valdez-v-state-texapp-2016.