Shellman v. Social Security Administration

614 F. App'x 672
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 28, 2015·No. No. 15-1326·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lisa Evette Shellman appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely this action challenging the Commissioner’s decision denying Shellman’s applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shellman v. Social Sec. Admin., No. 2:14-cv-00382-MSD-LRL, [673] 2015 WL 731631 (E.D.Va. Feb. 18, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shellman v. Social Security Administration, 614 F. App'x 672 (4th Cir. 2015).

614 F. App'x 672 (Shellman v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.