Shellman v. Odom
This text of 122 S.E. 878 (Shellman v. Odom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. There is no merit in the exception to the refusal of the court to allow a part of an amendment to the petition tendered by the plaintiff. The amendment tendered sought to vary and contradict the terms of a written contract, -by setting up a parol agreement contemporaneous with the writing.
2. While the case of Kirkland v. Odum, 156 Ga. 131 (118 S. E. 706), was between different parties, the lease under construction in the present case was discussed and construed in that case, and the controlling questions made in the instant case were decided there adversely to the contentions of the plaintiff in error. Applying those rulings to the issues presented in this record, the court did not err in granting a nonsuit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
122 S.E. 878, 158 Ga. 208, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shellman-v-odom-ga-1924.