Shelley v. Perri

3 A.D.3d 559, 770 N.Y.S.2d 653, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 723

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, Ford Motor Credit Company, doing business as Mazda American Credit appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated February 28, 2003, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for leave to add it as a party defendant and to serve it with a supplemental summons and amended complaint pursuant to CPLR 203 (b).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs motion for leave to add the appellant as a party defendant and to serve it with a supplemental summons and amended complaint pursuant to CPLR 203 (b) (see Buran v Coupal, 87 NY2d 173 [1995]; Mondello v New York Blood Ctr.-Greater N.Y. Blood Program, 80 NY2d 219 [1992]; Poulard v Papamihlopoulos, 254 AD2d 266 [1998]; Brock v Bua, 83 AD2d 61 [1981]). Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shelley v. Perri, 3 A.D.3d 559, 770 N.Y.S.2d 653, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 723 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

3 A.D.3d 559 (Shelley v. Perri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buran v. Coupal
661 N.E.2d 978 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Mondello v. New York Blood Center
604 N.E.2d 81 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
Brock v. Bua
83 A.D.2d 61 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Poulard v. Papamihlopoulos
254 A.D.2d 266 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)