Shelley Anne Turner v. Unification Church

602 F.2d 458
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided April 19, 1979·No. 78-1511·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Without subscribing to every particular of the district court’s thoughtful opinion, we are in accord with the court’s conclusion that plaintiff has failed to state any claim upon which relief can be granted and with the substance of its analysis material to that conclusion. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We need not and do not pass upon the correctness of the lower court’s preliminary description of the bearing of the first amendment in cases such as this. As the complaint fails to state any cause of action, there is no practical need to review the correctness of the district court’s decision that it lacked personal jurisdiction over the other two defendants, and we do not do so.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shelley Anne Turner v. Unification Church, 602 F.2d 458 (1st Cir. 1979).

602 F.2d 458 (Shelley Anne Turner v. Unification Church) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World Christianity
762 P.2d 46 (California Supreme Court, 1988)
Doe v. Keane
658 F. Supp. 216 (W.D. Michigan, 1987)
Miller v. Catholic Diocese of Great Falls
728 P.2d 794 (Montana Supreme Court, 1986)
Hosemann v. Technical Materials, Inc.
554 F. Supp. 659 (D. Rhode Island, 1982)
Schaick v. Church of Scientology of California, Inc.
535 F. Supp. 1125 (D. Massachusetts, 1982)