Shellar v. Shivers

33 A. 95, 171 Pa. 569, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1343
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 24, 1895
DocketAppeal, No. 183
StatusPublished
Cited by29 cases

This text of 33 A. 95 (Shellar v. Shivers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shellar v. Shivers, 33 A. 95, 171 Pa. 569, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1343 (Pa. 1895).

Opinion

Per Curt am,

This judgment was entered on the case stated for the opinion of the court, in the nature of a special verdict. The question involved was, whether under the terms of the lease the lessees had the right to remove the material, machinery and fixtures, placed by them upon the property for the purpose of drilling the oil well and remaining there after the expiration of the lease.

In a clear, concise and satisfactory opinion the learned judge rightly held that they had not, and he accordingly entered judgment in favor of the plaintiffs as provided for in the case stated. The correctness of this conclusion is so fully vindicated in the opinion that, without further discussion of the subject, we affirm the judgment on said opinion.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Willison v. Consolidation Coal Co.
637 A.2d 979 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)
Garr-Woolley v. Martin
579 P.2d 206 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 1978)
Haut v. Carlson
71 Pa. D. & C.2d 748 (Warren County Court of Common Pleas, 1975)
Oceana Oil Producers, Inc. v. Portland Silo Co.
100 N.E.2d 895 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1951)
Donnell v. Gray
34 So. 2d 648 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1948)
Repplier Coal Co. v. Commissioner
1 T.C.M. 141 (U.S. Tax Court, 1942)
Okmulgee Supply Corp. v. Anthis
1940 OK 428 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1940)
Bickerton v. Vaughn
38 Pa. D. & C. 645 (Fayette County Court, 1940)
United Natural Gas Co. v. James Bros. Lumber Co.
191 A. 12 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Black v. Hoffman
188 A. 149 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Kentucky Block Cannel Coal Co. v. Stacy
98 S.W.2d 61 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1936)
Davies v. Iroquois Gas Corp.
248 A.D. 670 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
Tuten v. Bowden
175 S.E. 510 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1934)
Louisiana Oil Refining Corp. v. Haltom
64 S.W.2d 98 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1933)
Simons v. McDaniel
1932 OK 34 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1932)
Sunburst Oil & Refining Co. v. Callender
274 P. 834 (Montana Supreme Court, 1929)
Patton v. Woodrow
248 S.W. 226 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1923)
Moore v. Carey Bros. Oil Co.
248 S.W. 470 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Michaels v. Pontius
137 N.E. 579 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1922)
Alabama MacHinery & Supply Co. v. Roquemore
87 So. 435 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 A. 95, 171 Pa. 569, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shellar-v-shivers-pa-1895.