Shella Lucien v. Pablo Martinez Ruiz

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 29, 2026·No. 3D2025-1529·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed April 29, 2026.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D25-1529

Lower Tribunal No. 25-26381-SP-23

Shella Lucien,

Appellant,

vs.

Pablo Martinez Ruiz,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Ayana Harris, Judge.

Shella Lucien, in proper person.

Pablo Martinez Ruiz, in proper person.

Before FERNANDEZ, MILLER, and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a[n adequate] record . . . the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shella Lucien v. Pablo Martinez Ruiz, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Shella Lucien v. Pablo Martinez Ruiz (Shella Lucien v. Pablo Martinez Ruiz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)