Shell v. Schwartz
This text of 975 So. 2d 1158 (Shell v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CARL SHELL, Appellant,
v.
TIM SCHWARTZ, CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, et al., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Carl Shell, Hollywood, pro se.
Jeffrey L. Hochman and Tamara M. Scrudders of Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke, Piper & Hochman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.
SHAHOOD, C.J.
We affirm on the authority of Caswell v. City of Detroit Housing Commission, 418 F.3d 615 (6th Cir. 2005).
Affirmed.
POLEN and MAY, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
975 So. 2d 1158, 2008 WL 583885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shell-v-schwartz-fladistctapp-2008.