Shell v. Schwartz

975 So. 2d 1158, 2008 WL 583885

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 5, 2008·No. 4D07-1919·Published

Opinion

CARL SHELL, Appellant,
v.
TIM SCHWARTZ, CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, et al., Appellees.

No. 4D07-1919.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Opinion filed March 5, 2008.

Carl Shell, Hollywood, pro se.

Jeffrey L. Hochman and Tamara M. Scrudders of Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke, Piper & Hochman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

SHAHOOD, C.J.

We affirm on the authority of Caswell v. City of Detroit Housing Commission, 418 F.3d 615 (6th Cir. 2005).

Affirmed.

POLEN and MAY, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CARL SHELL, Appellant,
v.
TIM SCHWARTZ, CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, et al., Appellees.

No. 4D07-1919.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Opinion filed March 5, 2008.

Carl Shell, Hollywood, pro se.

Jeffrey L. Hochman and Tamara M. Scrudders of Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke, Piper & Hochman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

SHAHOOD, C.J.

We affirm on the authority of Caswell v. City of Detroit Housing Commission, 418 F.3d 615 (6th Cir. 2005).

Affirmed.

POLEN and MAY, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Shell v. Schwartz, 975 So. 2d 1158, 2008 WL 583885 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

975 So. 2d 1158 (Shell v. Schwartz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oliver Caswell v. City of Detroit Housing Commission Taylor C. Segue Iii, Interim Executive Director

418 F.3d 615 (Sixth Circuit, 2005)