Shell v. Pruitt

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 21, 2010·No. 09-7444·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7444

ROBERT EDWARD LEE SHELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHARLES PRUITT; WILLIAM MASSELLO, III, Doctor,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:09-cv-00278-gec-mfu)

Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: January 21, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Edward Lee Shell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert Edward Lee Shell appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Shell v. Pruitt, No.

7:09-cv-00278-gec-mfu (W.D. Va. July 15, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shell v. Pruitt, (4th Cir. 2010).

Shell v. Pruitt (Shell v. Pruitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(2)