Shell Oil Co. v. Hebert

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Shell Oil Co. v. Hebert

376 So. 2d 318, 1979 La. LEXIS 7079

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 19, 1979

DocketNo. 65392

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 376 So. 2d 318 (Shell Oil Co. v. Hebert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shell Oil Co. v. Hebert, 376 So. 2d 318, 1979 La. LEXIS 7079 (La. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

In Re: Elsie Mae Braud, et al, applying - for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Nos. 12,573; 12,574; and 12,575, Parish of Terrebonne, 373 So.2d 1339.

Writ denied. While the rationale of the Court of Appeal may be incorrect, the result herein is correct.

TATE and DIXON, JJ., concur in the denial. The trial court correctly sustained the pleas of prescription; title cannot be acquired or lost by “estoppel.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: Elsie Mae Braud, et al, applying - for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Nos. 12,573; 12,574; and 12,575, Parish of Terrebonne, 373 So.2d 1339.

Writ denied. While the rationale of the Court of Appeal may be incorrect, the result herein is correct.

TATE and DIXON, JJ., concur in the denial. The trial court correctly sustained the pleas of prescription; title cannot be acquired or lost by “estoppel.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

376 So. 2d 318, 1979 La. LEXIS 7079, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shell-oil-co-v-hebert-la-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack