Shell Eastern Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Martindale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shell Eastern Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Martindale

237 A.D. 908

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 237 A.D. 908 (Shell Eastern Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Martindale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shell Eastern Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Martindale, 237 A.D. 908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the County Court of Nassau county affirming order of the Justice’s Court of the town of Hempstead, judgment of affirmance entered thereon, and order of the Justice’s Court reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed awarding possession of the premises in question to the landlord, with costs. In our opinion, the tenant held the premises under a lease for a fixed term of thirty days, which expired on September 5, 1931. and that thereafter he held over with the landlord’s consent for three additional similar terms, namely) until December fifth, at which time the landlord terminated the tenancy, and was entitled to do so, without giving a thirty-day notice to quit. Young, Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the County Court of Nassau county affirming order of the Justice’s Court of the town of Hempstead, judgment of affirmance entered thereon, and order of the Justice’s Court reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed awarding possession of the premises in question to the landlord, with costs. In our opinion, the tenant held the premises under a lease for a fixed term of thirty days, which expired on September 5, 1931. and that thereafter he held over with the landlord’s consent for three additional similar terms, namely) until December fifth, at which time the landlord terminated the tenancy, and was entitled to do so, without giving a thirty-day notice to quit. Young, Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 A.D. 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shell-eastern-petroleum-products-inc-v-martindale-nyappdiv-1933.