Sheldon v. Tiernan

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sheldon v. Tiernan

147 So. 2d 593

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 14, 1982

DocketNo. 3230

StatusPublished

This text of 147 So. 2d 593 (Sheldon v. Tiernan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sheldon v. Tiernan, 147 So. 2d 593 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant has moved to strike portions of the appellee’s brief as an attempt to argue on appeal a factual issue not raised in the trial court. Appellate review is, of course, confined to the record on appeal. We find that the protested portion of appellee’s brief goes outside the record and that the appellant’s point is well taken. The motion to strike is granted. Maistrosky v. Harvey, Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 103, 105; Kelley v. Kelley, Fla.1954, 75 So.2d 191.

ALLEN, Acting C. J., and KANNER and WHITE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant has moved to strike portions of the appellee’s brief as an attempt to argue on appeal a factual issue not raised in the trial court. Appellate review is, of course, confined to the record on appeal. We find that the protested portion of appellee’s brief goes outside the record and that the appellant’s point is well taken. The motion to strike is granted. Maistrosky v. Harvey, Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 103, 105; Kelley v. Kelley, Fla.1954, 75 So.2d 191.

ALLEN, Acting C. J., and KANNER and WHITE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 So. 2d 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheldon-v-tiernan-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack