Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Sheldon v. Mullins

Sheldon v. Mullins

946 So. 2d 1290, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1142, 2007 WL 283029
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 2, 2007
DocketNo. 5D05-3975
StatusPublished

This text of 946 So. 2d 1290 (Sheldon v. Mullins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sheldon v. Mullins, 946 So. 2d 1290, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1142, 2007 WL 283029 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See LaMarr v. Lang, 796 So.2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (noting trial court enjoys wide discretion in determining the admissibility of evidence); Fla. Pottery Stores, Inc. v. Am. Nat’l Bank, 578 So.2d 801, 804 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (“To be within ... the provision in the statute of frauds concerning agreements not to be performed within the space of one year ..., it must be shown that neither party’s performance was intended to be complete within one year.”).

THOMPSON, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Florida Pottery Stores of Panama City, Inc. v. American Nat. Bank
578 So. 2d 801 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
LaMarr v. Lang
796 So. 2d 1208 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
946 So. 2d 1290, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1142, 2007 WL 283029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheldon-v-mullins-fladistctapp-2007.