Sheldon v. Mullins
946 So. 2d 1290, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1142, 2007 WL 283029
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See LaMarr v. Lang, 796 So.2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (noting trial court enjoys wide discretion in determining the admissibility of evidence); Fla. Pottery Stores, Inc. v. Am. Nat’l Bank, 578 So.2d 801, 804 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (“To be within ... the provision in the statute of frauds concerning agreements not to be performed within the space of one year ..., it must be shown that neither party’s performance was intended to be complete within one year.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sheldon v. Mullins, 946 So. 2d 1290, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1142, 2007 WL 283029 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
946 So. 2d 1290 (Sheldon v. Mullins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Florida Pottery Stores of Panama City, Inc. v. American Nat. Bank
578 So. 2d 801 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
LaMarr v. Lang
796 So. 2d 1208 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)