Sheldon v. Lappin

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6574

WYNN H. SHELDON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HARRY G. LAPPIN, Director; B. A. BLEDSOE, Warden/Regional Director; K. M. WHITE; J. JONES; STRICKLAND; HILL; SHULTS, Acting Captain; CAPTAIN WILLIAMS; LIEUTENANT TREES; LIEUTENANT GRAPPERHAUS; LIEUTENANT PITT; LIEUTENANT ALLEN; DOCTOR DEJESUS; DOCTOR RAMIREZ; DOCTOR ELLIS; IRWIN FISH, Physician Assistant; D. ROTH, Physician Assistant; P. HERRELL, R.N.; D. DUNCAN, R.N.; T. HORNSBY, R.N.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:06-cv-00049)

Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 29, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wynn H. Sheldon, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Wynn H. Sheldon appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six

Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388

(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Sheldon v. Lappin, No. 7:06-cv-00049 (W.D. Va. Mar. 15,

2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -