Sheldon v. Hoffnagle
This text of 4 N.Y.S. 287 (Sheldon v. Hoffnagle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The decision by the court at special term was quite as favorable to the plaintiff as the facts and law would warrant, and the judgment entered in the action should be affirmed, with costs. The reasons assigned by the learned justice who tried the action as they appear in his opinion, are so far satisfactory as to render it unnecessary to further discuss the questions involved. 27either the facts nor the law establish in favor of the plaintiff any right or equity superior to that which the judgment herein secures to her. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 N.Y.S. 287, 51 Hun 478, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheldon-v-hoffnagle-nysupct-1889.