Sheldon v. Hoffnagle

4 N.Y.S. 287, 51 Hun 478, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 286
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 7, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 N.Y.S. 287 (Sheldon v. Hoffnagle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sheldon v. Hoffnagle, 4 N.Y.S. 287, 51 Hun 478, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 286 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

Opinion

Ingalls, J.

The decision by the court at special term was quite as favorable to the plaintiff as the facts and law would warrant, and the judgment entered in the action should be affirmed, with costs. The reasons assigned by the learned justice who tried the action as they appear in his opinion, are so far satisfactory as to render it unnecessary to further discuss the questions involved. 27either the facts nor the law establish in favor of the plaintiff any right or equity superior to that which the judgment herein secures to her. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hennessy v. King
225 A.D. 156 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 N.Y.S. 287, 51 Hun 478, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheldon-v-hoffnagle-nysupct-1889.