Sheldon v. Frink

29 Mass. 568
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 28, 1832
StatusPublished

This text of 29 Mass. 568 (Sheldon v. Frink) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sheldon v. Frink, 29 Mass. 568 (Mass. 1832).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The exception in the present case is founded upon a rule strictly technical; still it is a well settled rule, founded in considerations of general expediency, that the judg ments and proceedings of a court of record must be proved by the record, or an authenticated transcript. The plaintiff’s case required him to show that a final judgment had been entered in the action in question, pending in another county. The evidence by the testimony of a witness, might have been very satisfactory in the particular case ; but by the general rulé, adopted for general convenience, we think it was inadmissible and was rightly rejected. The exception is overruled, and the judgment of the C. C. P. affirmed.1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Webb v. Alexander
7 Wend. 281 (New York Supreme Court, 1831)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 Mass. 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheldon-v-frink-mass-1832.