Sheldon v. Fannin
This text of 214 F. Supp. 940 (Sheldon v. Fannin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As we understand the position of plaintiffs (through examination of the entire record before us, their briefs and oral argument,) it is that members of a local school board, acting under authority bestowed by state statutes, state-wide in their application to school boards, have violated constitutional rights of these plaintiffs. Such violation consisted of requiring these plaintiffs, as students, contrary to their religious beliefs and on penalty of expulsion, to stand while the national anthem was sung or played in school. This requirement was not imposed by statute or by administrative action of any state agency or officer other than the local school board itself, and had no application to any other school district.
As we read the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States this does not present a case for a three-judge court. Ex parte Bransford (1940), 310 U.S. 354, 60 S.Ct. 947, 84 L.Ed. 1249; Wilentz v. Sovereign Camp (1939), 306 U.S. 573, 59 S.Ct. 709, 83 L.Ed. 994; Ex parte Public National Bank of New [941]*941York (1928), 278 U.S. 101, 49 S.Ct. 43, 73 L.Ed. 202; Ex parte Collins (1928), 277 U.S. 565, 48 S.Ct. 585, 72 L.Ed. 990; See: City of Cleveland v. United States (1945), 323 U.S. 329, 65 S.Ct. 280, 89 L.Ed. 274.
Plaintiffs have this day tendered four proposed amendments to the first amended complaint. Their motion for leave to amend in these respects is opposed by the defendants. Without ruling on these motions this Court has accepted them as offers of proof. We find nothing in them to change our views as here expressed.
This Court as now constituted may then proceed no further.
Accordingly, upon this Court’s own motion, IT IS ORDERED that this case proceed henceforth before the single judge to whom the case was originally assigned, as if this three-judge court had never been convened.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
214 F. Supp. 940, 1962 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheldon-v-fannin-azd-1962.