Sheldon v. Clark

1 Johns. 513
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1806
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 1 Johns. 513 (Sheldon v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sheldon v. Clark, 1 Johns. 513 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1806).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The averment, that the defendant practised physic contrary to the statute, was sufficient; and it was incumbent on the defendant, by his plea, to have brought himself within some of the provisos of the act. As he has not done so, either by pleading or evidence, we are of opinion that the judgment ought to be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bell v. State
137 S.W. 670 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1911)
People v. . Ebelt
73 N.E. 235 (New York Court of Appeals, 1905)
State v. Chapman
55 A. 94 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1903)
Rowell v. . Janvrin
45 N.E. 393 (New York Court of Appeals, 1896)
People v. Swineford
43 N.W. 929 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1889)
People v. . Briggs
20 N.E. 820 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)
People v. Phippin
37 N.W. 888 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1888)
City of Chicago v. Wood
24 Ill. App. 40 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1887)
Eastman v. State
10 N.E. 97 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1887)
Williams v. People
20 Ill. App. 92 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1886)
Raynor v. State
22 N.W. 430 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1885)
State v. Dent
25 W. Va. 1 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1884)
United States v. Rose
12 F. 576 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1882)
Brand v. Steckert
1 Mich. N.P. 67 (Circuit Court of the 10th Circuit of Michigan, 1869)
State ex rel. Ladd v. Clark
42 Mo. 519 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1868)
Myers v. Carr
12 Mich. 63 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1863)
State v. McGlynn
34 N.H. 422 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1857)
Doe v. Burnham
31 N.H. 426 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1855)
Carlton v. Bailey
27 N.H. 230 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1853)
Gassett v. Godfrey
26 N.H. 415 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1853)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Johns. 513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheldon-v-clark-nysupct-1806.