Sheldon Terrace, Inc. v. Schneider

18 Misc. 2d 456, 193 N.Y.S.2d 484, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3470
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 16, 1959·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The agreed statement of facts was inadequate to permit of a disposition of the issues tendered for litigation. Since it appears without dispute that the tenants were in possession at the time of the institution of this summary proceeding, their subsequent voluntary removal during its pendency did not have the effect of depriving the court of jurisdiction. (Carnegie Hill Realties Securities v. Surowitz, 150 N. Y. S. 2d 850; Four Forty-one Holding Corp. v. Bloom, 148 Misc. 565.)

The final order should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts and a new trial granted, with $30 costs on this appeal to abide the event.

Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.

Pinal order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheldon Terrace, Inc. v. Schneider, 18 Misc. 2d 456, 193 N.Y.S.2d 484, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3470 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

18 Misc. 2d 456 (Sheldon Terrace, Inc. v. Schneider) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

124-02 Rockaway Blvd LLC v. Ecuafast Multiservice LLC
2025 NY Slip Op 51564(U) (NYC Civil Court, Queens, 2025)
Abner Props. Co. v. Frederick Goldman, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017
Goldman v. Rosen
9 Misc. 3d 778 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2005)
Sowalsky v. E. F. MacDonald Stamp Co.
31 A.D.2d 582 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
Schor v. Domery
34 Misc. 2d 865 (New York Town and Village Courts, 1962)
Lex-56th Corp. v. Morgan
24 Misc. 2d 48 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1960)