Sheldon Terrace, Inc. v. Schneider
This text of 18 Misc. 2d 456 (Sheldon Terrace, Inc. v. Schneider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The agreed statement of facts was inadequate to permit of a disposition of the issues tendered for litigation. Since it appears without dispute that the tenants were in possession at the time of the institution of this summary proceeding, their subsequent voluntary removal during its pendency did not have the effect of depriving the court of jurisdiction. (Carnegie Hill Realties Securities v. Surowitz, 150 N. Y. S. 2d 850; Four Forty-one Holding Corp. v. Bloom, 148 Misc. 565.)
The final order should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts and a new trial granted, with $30 costs on this appeal to abide the event.
Pinal order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 Misc. 2d 456, 193 N.Y.S.2d 484, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheldon-terrace-inc-v-schneider-nyappterm-1959.