Shelby Rose Sowle v. Esurance Insurance Company
This text of Shelby Rose Sowle v. Esurance Insurance Company (Shelby Rose Sowle v. Esurance Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
December 8, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 162118-20(72) Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra SHELBY ROSE SOWLE, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellee, Elizabeth T. Clement and Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices
HANGER PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS, INC., doing business as HANGER CLINIC, Intervening Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 162118, 162119, 162120 v COA: 346289, 347819, 348538 Ingham CC: 17-000035-NF ESURANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________________/
On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to extend the time for filing its reply is GRANTED. The reply submitted on December 4, 2020, is accepted as timely filed.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. December 8, 2020
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Shelby Rose Sowle v. Esurance Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shelby-rose-sowle-v-esurance-insurance-company-mich-2020.