Shelby Iron Co. v. Bean

93 So. 906, 208 Ala. 264, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 443
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedOctober 26, 1922
Docket7 Div. 335.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 93 So. 906 (Shelby Iron Co. v. Bean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shelby Iron Co. v. Bean, 93 So. 906, 208 Ala. 264, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 443 (Ala. 1922).

Opinion

McCLELLAN, j.

This is the second appeal in the course of the litigation. Shelby Iron Co. v. Bean, 203 Ala. 79, 82 South. 93. A satisfactory statement of the case there appears.

Of the errors assigned there is in the brief for appellant sufficient insistence to invoke review upon only one assignment, viz. that predicated of the action of the court in overruling appellant’s demurrer to the amended count A, drawn to state a cause of action under subdivision 1, § 3910, Code. The amended count described the defect alleged as consisting of a defective furnace stack, thereby, after reversal on formal appeal, removing the fault that (on original consideration) was found to affect the count. After the amendment stated the count was not too' general in respect of efficient description of the defect averred. The cases cited on brief for appellant do not invite a different conclusion.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. L, and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lipscomb v. Paul
168 So. 2d 214 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 So. 906, 208 Ala. 264, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shelby-iron-co-v-bean-ala-1922.