Shelby Building & Loan Ass'n v. Black

2 S.E.2d 6, 215 N.C. 400, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 273
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedApril 12, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 2 S.E.2d 6 (Shelby Building & Loan Ass'n v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shelby Building & Loan Ass'n v. Black, 2 S.E.2d 6, 215 N.C. 400, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 273 (N.C. 1939).

Opinion

ScheNck, J.

In the record it is stipulated that the only question involved on this appeal is whether the action is barred by the statute of limitation pleaded, chapter 529, Public Laws 1933; and the answer to the question is dependent upon what is meant by the words “within one year from the date of sale under such foreclosure.”

It is the contention of the defendant that the aforesaid words mean within one year from the date the property was exposed for sale at public auction, and that since this exposure was made on 22 August, 1936, and this action was commenced on 28 August, 1937, six days more than one year from the first date, the action is barred by the statute pleaded. It is the contention of the plaintiff that the words mean within one year from the consummation of the foreclosure sale, and that such consummation could not take place until at least ten days after the exposure for sale at public auction. We concur with the contention of the plaintiff.

By becoming the last and highest bidder at the foreclosure sale on 22 August, 1936, the plaintiff became but a proposed purchaser or pre *402 ferred bidder during the ten days allowed by statute for an increase in the bid. Davis v. Insurance Co., 197 N. C., 617; Alexander v. Boyd, 204 N. C., 103; Creech v. Wilder, 212 N. C., 162. During this ten days there was an offer of purchase by the last and highest bidder, but no acceptance thereof by the trustee, which was necessary for a consummation of the sale. C. S., 2591, provides that “in the foreclosure of . . . deeds of trust on real estate . . . the sale shall- not be deemed to be closed under ten days. If in ten days from the date of the sale, the sale price is increased . . . and the same is paid to the clerk of the Superior Court, the . . . trustee . . . shall reopen the sale of said property and advertise the same in the same manner as in the first instance.” The provision that the foreclosure sale “shall not be deemed to be closed under ten days” from the date the property was exposed to sale at public auction clearly means that such foreclosure sale cannot be consummated within ten days from such exposure. The tenth day after 22 August, 1936, the date the property was exposed for sale at public auction, was 1 September, 1936, which was the earliest possible date that the foreclosure sale could have .been deemed closed, or consummated, and 28 August, 1937, the date this action was commenced, was four days less than one year therefrom.

We are of the opinion, and so hold, that the ruling of the Superior Court was correct and the judgment thereof is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beneficial Mortgage Co. of North Carolina, Inc. v. Barrington & Jones Law Firm, P.A.
595 S.E.2d 705 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
BENEFICIAL MORTGAGE CO. OF NORTH CAROLINA INC. v. Barrington
595 S.E.2d 705 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
LaSalle National Bank v. Price (In Re Price)
305 B.R. 240 (D. Maryland, 2003)
Homeq v. Watkins
572 S.E.2d 871 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)
In Re Barham
193 B.R. 229 (E.D. North Carolina, 1996)
Tech Land Development, Inc. v. South Carolina Insurance
291 S.E.2d 821 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)
North Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank of Durham v. Bland
56 S.E.2d 30 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)
McCullen v. . Durham
50 S.E.2d 511 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)
Howard v. . Ray
24 S.E.2d 529 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1943)
Albright v. . Pearce
3 S.E.2d 18 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 S.E.2d 6, 215 N.C. 400, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shelby-building-loan-assn-v-black-nc-1939.