Shekhem'Elbey v. City of New York

Second Circuit

Shekhem'Elbey v. City of New York

33 F. App'x 10

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 24, 2002

DocketDocket No. 01-7770

StatusPublished

This text of 33 F. App'x 10 (Shekhem'Elbey v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shekhem'Elbey v. City of New York, 33 F. App'x 10 (2d Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED.

Yashua Amen Shekhem’El Bey, pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals from an order entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sprizzo, J.), granting the defendants’ motions for summary judgment for all claims raised in the following two actions: El-Bey v. City of New York, Dkt. No. 01-7770 (“El-Bey I”) and El-Bey v. City of New York, Dkt. No. 01-0166 (“ElBey II”). We have considered all of plaintiffs contentions on this appeal. We affirm the judgment of the district court for substantially the reasons stated in Judge Sprizzo’s Memorandum and Order dated May 15, 2001.

For the reasons set forth above, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED.

Yashua Amen Shekhem’El Bey, pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals from an order entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sprizzo, J.), granting the defendants’ motions for summary judgment for all claims raised in the following two actions: El-Bey v. City of New York, Dkt. No. 01-7770 (“El-Bey I”) and El-Bey v. City of New York, Dkt. No. 01-0166 (“ElBey II”). We have considered all of plaintiffs contentions on this appeal. We affirm the judgment of the district court for substantially the reasons stated in Judge Sprizzo’s Memorandum and Order dated May 15, 2001.

For the reasons set forth above, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 F. App'x 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shekhemelbey-v-city-of-new-york-ca2-2002.