Sheiran Pudifin v. Russell Ginn
This text of Sheiran Pudifin v. Russell Ginn (Sheiran Pudifin v. Russell Ginn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-01-0319-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL A
NOVEMBER 26, 2001
______________________________
SHEIRAN PUDIFIN, APPELLANT
V.
RUSSELL GINN, APPELLEE
_________________________________
FROM THE 246TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY;
NO. 200114524; HONORABLE DON RITTER, JUDGE
_______________________________
Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.
Appellant Sheiran Pudifin appeals pro se from a protective order entered against
her at the request of appellee Russell Ginn, her former spouse. For the reasons we
express, we dismiss the appeal.
The clerk’s record and reporter’s records were filed on August 6, 2001. That being
so, appellant’s brief was due to be filed no later than September 5, 2001. Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). No such brief was ever filed. We notified appellant by letter dated October 25,
2001, that neither a brief nor a motion for extension of time to file a brief had been filed,
and unless a response reasonably explaining the failure, together with a showing that
appellee had not been significantly injured due to such failure was received by November
6, 2001, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).
We have received no response to that letter.
Accordingly, the appeal must be and hereby is dismissed.
John T. Boyd Chief Justice
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sheiran Pudifin v. Russell Ginn, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheiran-pudifin-v-russell-ginn-texapp-2001.