Sheir v. Dinkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sheir v. Dinkins

41 A.D.2d 944, 344 N.Y.S.2d 987, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4483

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 41 A.D.2d 944 (Sheir v. Dinkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sheir v. Dinkins, 41 A.D.2d 944, 344 N.Y.S.2d 987, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4483 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating respondent [945]*945I. Usher Kirshblum as a candidate in the Liberal Party Primary Election to be held on June 4, 1973 for nomination for the public office of Councilman for the 22nd Councilmanic District, Queens County, the appeal is by petitioner, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered May 7, 1973, as denied and dismissed the proceeding and directed that said respondent’s name be printed on the ballot. This proceeding was part of another proceeding, but was severed therefrom (see Matter of Mahler v. Dmkins, 41 A D 2d 944). Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. No opinion. Rabin, P. J., Martuscello, Shapiro, Gulotta and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating respondent [945]*945I. Usher Kirshblum as a candidate in the Liberal Party Primary Election to be held on June 4, 1973 for nomination for the public office of Councilman for the 22nd Councilmanic District, Queens County, the appeal is by petitioner, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered May 7, 1973, as denied and dismissed the proceeding and directed that said respondent’s name be printed on the ballot. This proceeding was part of another proceeding, but was severed therefrom (see Matter of Mahler v. Dmkins, 41 A D 2d 944). Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. No opinion. Rabin, P. J., Martuscello, Shapiro, Gulotta and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.D.2d 944, 344 N.Y.S.2d 987, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheir-v-dinkins-nyappdiv-1973.