Sheinheit v. Garrison

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sheinheit v. Garrison

865 So. 2d 596, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 209, 2004 WL 57290

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 14, 2004·No. Nos. 3D03-555, 3D03-1120·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gianna Sheinheit appeals a final judgment for damages and a permanent injunction. First, we conclude that the order striking the appellant’s pleadings is supported by the record and within the discretion allowed by Mercer v. Raine, 443 So.2d [597]*597944 (Fla.1984). We affirm the order denying the motion for disqualification on authority of Fischer v. Knuck, 497 So.2d 240 (Fla.1986) and Dura-Stress, Inc. v. Law, 634 So.2d 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). The denial of the motion for continuance was within the court’s discretion. The record supports the entry of the permanent injunction.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Gianna Sheinheit appeals a final judgment for damages and a permanent injunction. First, we conclude that the order striking the appellant’s pleadings is supported by the record and within the discretion allowed by Mercer v. Raine, 443 So.2d [597]*597944 (Fla.1984). We affirm the order denying the motion for disqualification on authority of Fischer v. Knuck, 497 So.2d 240 (Fla.1986) and Dura-Stress, Inc. v. Law, 634 So.2d 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). The denial of the motion for continuance was within the court’s discretion. The record supports the entry of the permanent injunction.

Affirmed.

Sheinheit v. Garrison, 865 So. 2d 596, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 209, 2004 WL 57290 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

865 So. 2d 596 (Sheinheit v. Garrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related