Sheinheit v. Garrison

865 So. 2d 596, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 209, 2004 WL 57290
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 14, 2004
DocketNos. 3D03-555, 3D03-1120
StatusPublished

This text of 865 So. 2d 596 (Sheinheit v. Garrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sheinheit v. Garrison, 865 So. 2d 596, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 209, 2004 WL 57290 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gianna Sheinheit appeals a final judgment for damages and a permanent injunction. First, we conclude that the order striking the appellant’s pleadings is supported by the record and within the discretion allowed by Mercer v. Raine, 443 So.2d [597]*597944 (Fla.1984). We affirm the order denying the motion for disqualification on authority of Fischer v. Knuck, 497 So.2d 240 (Fla.1986) and Dura-Stress, Inc. v. Law, 634 So.2d 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). The denial of the motion for continuance was within the court’s discretion. The record supports the entry of the permanent injunction.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fischer v. Knuck
497 So. 2d 240 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Dura-Stress, Inc. v. Law
634 So. 2d 769 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Mercer v. Raine
443 So. 2d 944 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
865 So. 2d 596, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 209, 2004 WL 57290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheinheit-v-garrison-fladistctapp-2004.