Shein v. United States

343 U.S. 944, 72 S. Ct. 1043
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 12, 1952·No. No. 731·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of Jack Garrett Scott for leave to withdraw his appearance as counsel for the appellants is granted. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shein v. United States, 343 U.S. 944, 72 S. Ct. 1043 (1952).

343 U.S. 944 (Shein v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bays
2011 Ohio 3021 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)
Joseph W. Di Silvestro v. United States
767 F.2d 30 (Second Circuit, 1985)
Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. United States
311 F. Supp. 860 (N.D. Illinois, 1970)
Tose, Inc. v. United States
304 F. Supp. 894 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1969)
A. L. Root Transportation, Inc. v. United States
280 F. Supp. 152 (D. Vermont, 1968)
State v. Harbatuk
229 A.2d 820 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)
Key v. United States
263 F. Supp. 544 (S.D. Indiana, 1966)
Legge v. United States
244 F. Supp. 878 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1965)
Clarence D. Rogers v. United States
330 F.2d 535 (Fifth Circuit, 1964)
State v. Ferraro
195 A.2d 227 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1963)
DeCamp Bus Lines v. United States
224 F. Supp. 196 (D. New Jersey, 1963)
P. Saldutti & Son, Inc. v. United States
210 F. Supp. 307 (D. New Jersey, 1962)
Retail Stores Delivery, Inc. v. Department of Public Utilities & an Intervener
159 N.E.2d 646 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1959)