SHEILDA DESSOURCES v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and MARQUIS STEPHEN ACOSTA
This text of SHEILDA DESSOURCES v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and MARQUIS STEPHEN ACOSTA (SHEILDA DESSOURCES v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and MARQUIS STEPHEN ACOSTA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
SHEILDA DESSOURCES, Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and MARQUIS STEPHEN ACOSTA, Appellees.
No. 4D22-1166
[November 23, 2022]
Appeal from the State of Florida, Department of Revenue Child Support; L.T. Case Nos. 22-000539CS, CS2001719587, DEP062100119999CA.
Sheilda Dessources, Miami, pro se.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
GROSS, MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
SHEILDA DESSOURCES v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and MARQUIS STEPHEN ACOSTA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheilda-dessources-v-department-of-revenue-child-support-enforcement-and-fladistctapp-2022.