Sheila Wilson v. Tarrant County Constables, Its Agents, Assigns and/or Successors in Interest, Its Affiants, U. S. Persons of Interest (Person, Firms, Corporations and Political Entities,) and Federal National Mortgage Association, Its Agents
This text of Sheila Wilson v. Tarrant County Constables, Its Agents, Assigns and/or Successors in Interest, Its Affiants, U. S. Persons of Interest (Person, Firms, Corporations and Political Entities,) and Federal National Mortgage Association, Its Agents (Sheila Wilson v. Tarrant County Constables, Its Agents, Assigns and/or Successors in Interest, Its Affiants, U. S. Persons of Interest (Person, Firms, Corporations and Political Entities,) and Federal National Mortgage Association, Its Agents) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-13-00382-CV
SHEILA WILSON APPELLANT
V.
TARRANT COUNTY APPELLEES CONSTABLES, ITS AGENTS, ASSIGNS AND/OR SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST, ITS AFFIANTS, U.S. PERSONS OF INTEREST (PERSON, FIRMS, CORPORATIONS AND POLITICAL ENTITIES), AND FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, ITS AGENTS AND/OR SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST, AND ITS AFFIANTS
----------
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY
---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
Sheila Wilson appeals from a September 9, 2013 order dismissing her suit.
Although her notice of appeal was due October 9, 2013, she did not mail it for
filing until October 25, 2013; therefore, her notice of appeal was untimely. See
Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b), 26.1(a)(1), 26.3.
On October 28, 2013, we sent appellant a letter indicating our concern that
we do not have jurisdiction over the appeal because the notice of appeal is
untimely and stating that unless she filed a response showing grounds for
continuing the appeal, the appeal could be dismissed. Although appellant filed a
response, it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal.
Because appellant’s notice of appeal is untimely, we dismiss the appeal for
want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(a), 26.1(a)(1), 42.3(a), 43.2(f);
Crites v. Collins, 284 S.W.3d 839, 840 (Tex. 2009) (indicating that jurisdiction
vests with a timely-filed notice of appeal); Howlett v. Tarrant Cnty., 301 S.W.3d
840, 843 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009, pet. denied) (op. on reh’g) (“A timely-filed
notice of appeal confers jurisdiction on this court, and absent a timely[-]filed
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2 notice of appeal, we must dismiss the appeal.”).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.
DELIVERED: December 12, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sheila Wilson v. Tarrant County Constables, Its Agents, Assigns and/or Successors in Interest, Its Affiants, U. S. Persons of Interest (Person, Firms, Corporations and Political Entities,) and Federal National Mortgage Association, Its Agents, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheila-wilson-v-tarrant-county-constables-its-agents-assigns-andor-texapp-2013.