Sheila Nance v. BNSF Railway Company
Opinion
|
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH |
NO. 02-11-00356-CV
|
Sheila Nance |
APPELLANT |
|
|
V. |
||
|
BNSF Railway Company |
APPELLEE |
|
------------
FROM THE 141st District Court OF Tarrant COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
We have considered appellant's “Agreed Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.
DELIVERED: November 23, 2011
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sheila Nance v. BNSF Railway Company (Sheila Nance v. BNSF Railway Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.