Sheikh v. Spinnaker Ins. Co.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 3, 2025·No. 2:23-cv-01582·Unknown

Opinion

Yasin M. Almadani (SBN 242798) MIN K. KANG (SBN 246904) ALMADANI LAW mkang@hinshawlaw.com 4695 MacArthur Ct., Suite 1100 TAMI KAY LEE (SBN 224096) Newport Beach, CA 92660 tlee@hinshawlaw.com Tel: (949) 877-7177 HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP Fax: (949) 877-8757 350 South Grand Ave., Suite 3600 YMA@LawAlm.com Los Angeles, CA 90071-3476 Telephone: 213-680-2800 Attorneys for Plaintiff Facsimile: 213-614-7399

Attorneys for Defendants SPINNAKER INSURANCE COMPANY, and HIPPO ANALYTICS INC. dba HIPPO INSURANCE SERVICES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FIRDOS S. SHEIKH, M.D., an individual, Case No. 2:23-cv-01582-TLN-SCR

Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

vs. Hon. Troy J. Nunley United States District Judge an Illinois Company; HIPPO ANALYTICS Hon. Sean C. Riordan INC. dba HIPPO ENTERPRISES INC. dba United States Magistrate Judge HIPPO INSURANCE SERVICES, a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1-10 inclusive, Defendants. A. Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The

parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section XIII(C), below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Eastern District Civil Local Rule 251 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the Court to file material under seal. A. This action may call upon Defendants’ disclosure and production of liability insurance agreements, and possibly private/protected information regarding trade secrets, customer and pricing lists, and other valuable research, development, commercial, financial information or financial condition, technical and/or proprietary information for which special protection from public

disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution or defense of this action is warranted. Such confidential and proprietary materials may also consist of, among other things, commercial information (including information implicating privacy rights of third parties), and information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. This action may also further call for Plaintiff’s disclosure and production of private medical or mental health information or personally identifiable information (e.g., social security numbers, dates of birth, etc.). Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in

preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. A. Action: This pending federal law suit B. Challenging Party: A Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order.

C. “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: Information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. D. Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). E. Designating Party: A Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” F. Disclosure or Discovery Material: All items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained

(including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. G. Expert: A person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. H. House Counsel: Attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. I. Non-Party: Any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action.

J. Outside Counsel of Record: Attorneys who are not employees of a party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. K. Party: Any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). L. Producing Party: A Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this Action. M. Professional Vendors: Persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or

medium) and their employees and subcontractors. N. Protected Material: Any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” O. Receiving Party: A Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. A. The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheikh v. Spinnaker Ins. Co., (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Sheikh v. Spinnaker Ins. Co. (Sheikh v. Spinnaker Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)